"Instruction 4. An acquisition or disposition shall be deemed to involve a significant amount of assets:
(i) if the registrant’s and its other subsidiaries’ equity in the net book value of such assets or the amount paid or received for the assets upon such acquisition or disposition exceeded 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries; or
(ii) if it involved a business (see 17 CFR 210.11-01(d)) that is significant (see 17 CFR 210.11-01(b))."
(i) above talks about “assets (hereinafter referred to as the “asset test”),” but interestingly, (ii) above introduces the term, “business,” with references to Reg. S-X sections (hereinafter referred to as the “business test”).
Reg. S-K 11-01(d) explains the meaning of “business” to be considered under our Item 2.01 test:
"(d) For purposes of this rule, the term business should be evaluated in light of the facts and circumstances involved and whether there is sufficient continuity of the acquired entity's operations prior to and after the transactions so that disclosure of prior financial information is material to an understanding of future operations. A presumption exists that a separate entity, a subsidiary, or a division is a business. However, a lesser component of an entity may also constitute a business. Among the facts and circumstances which should be considered in evaluating whether an acquisition of a lesser component of an entity constitutes a business are the following:
(1) Whether the nature of the revenue-producing activity of the component will remain generally the same as before the transaction; or
(2) Whether any of the following attributes remain with the component after the transaction:
(i) Physical facilities,
(ii) Employee base,
(iii) Market distribution system,
(iv) Sales force,
(v) Customer base,
(vi) Operating rights,
(vii) Production techniques, or
(viii) Trade names."
Once one concludes whether the transaction contemplated is considered a transaction involving a business as defined by Reg. S-X 11-01(d), then one should analyze whether such business is considered “significant” under Reg. S-X 11-01(b).
Reg. S-K 11-01 (b) provides “a business combination or disposition of a business shall be considered significant if:
(1) A comparison of the most recent annual financial statements of the “business acquired or to be acquired” and the registrant's most recent annual consolidated financial statements filed at or prior to the date of acquisition indicates that the business would be a significant subsidiary pursuant to the conditions specified in §210.1-02(w), substituting 20 percent for 10 percent each place it appears therein; or
(2) The business to be disposed of meets the conditions of a significant subsidiary in §210.1-02(w).”
Reg. S-K 1-02(w) further provides the meaning of “significant subsidiary.” The term significant subsidiary means a subsidiary, including its subsidiaries, which meets any of the following conditions:
(1) The registrant's and its other subsidiaries' investments in and advances to the subsidiary exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries consolidated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year (for a proposed combination between entities under common control, this condition is also met when the number of common shares exchanged or to be exchanged by the registrant exceeds 10 percent of its total common shares outstanding at the date the combination is initiated); or
(2) The registrant's and its other subsidiaries' proportionate share of the total assets (after intercompany eliminations) of the subsidiary exceeds 10 percent of the total assets of the registrants and its subsidiaries consolidated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year; or
(3) The registrant's and its other subsidiaries' equity in the income from continuing operations before income taxes, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of the subsidiary exclusive of amounts attributable to any noncontrolling interests exceeds 10 percent of such income of the registrant and its subsidiaries consolidated for the most recently completed fiscal year.
Note to paragraph (w): A registrant that files its financial statements in accordance with or provides a reconciliation to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles shall make the prescribed tests using amounts determined under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. A foreign private issuer that files its financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB shall make the prescribed tests using amounts determined under IFRS as issued by the IASB.
Interestingly, the Financial Reporting Manual seems to contradict Form 8-K Item 2.01 or the instruction thereto:
2040.1 of the Financial Reporting Manual with respect to Form 8-K Item 2.01 states “a) Item 2.01, Form 8-K reporting the transaction is required within 4 business days of the consummation of any business acquisition exceeding 20% significance or for any asset purchase exceeding 10% significance that does not meet the definition of a business.”
...
c) If the required financial statements of the business acquired are not required to be provided with the initial report, they must be filed by amendment within 71 calendar days after the date that the initial report on Form 8-K must be filed.
NOTE: While an Item 2.01 Form 8-K is not required for business acquisitions at or below 20% significance, registrants may elect to report business acquisitions at or below 20% significance pursuant to Item 8.01 of Form 8-K even if financial information is not provided."
Both the Office of Chief Accountant and the Office of Chief Counsel at CorpFin of SEC confirmed that this Note is the interpretation of Item 2.01 requirement by both offices as of June 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment